A little nugget of anti-mystery [GAME 4] [SOLVED]

What I mean is that it can travel the seas as many times it wants every other year.

Unless you want to contest my definition of “travels on a biyearly basis” with a red such as “the boat does the cruise only once a year at most”?

Also, to be specific, the narrative never did state it “only travels on a biyearly basis”, only that the boat “travels on a biyearly basis”, leaving room for other trips in addition to the biyearly trip.

I shall clarify then!

The boat only travels on a biyearly basis. This defines how many times that it travels the seas, and that definition is not unlimited!

1 Like

Avoiding my clear suggestion for a vague expression like that?

Fair enough. The definition for “biyearly” is twice a year. This leaves an opportunity for one employee to enjoy the cruise at a different time than the official holiday.

If you doubt my definition, look no further than here. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/biyearly

2 Likes

I also have an objection.

This question was never answered. Well it was answered, but there are open blue statements that have never been responded to. It is too early to close the curtains on this tale!

Well then, I see you have indeed made your way to the heart of the tale there.

However, @pictoshark @midsummer I think @Karifean has some questions.

How do you guys respond~

Also, Kari, which blues are still open that aren’t accepted?

Post 13. @pictoshark specifically declined responding.

Oh, that trick was brutal. Had I not listened to a certain biweekly podcast that got complaints because people were confused as to whether it’s supposed to air twice a week or every two weeks, with the people in the podcast briefly discussing this confusion, I would never have seen the truth.

Verily, you are the cruelest witch of this site, even more cruel than the witch of nuggets who knows there are no nuggets left. Because he ate them all.

I actually suspected the biyearly thing earlier, but since everything else was about “every other year” at that time I couldn’t think of a way to apply that. Well played.

Damn… I should’ve brought that “biyearly” thing up… Gotta be more diligent in future gameboards!

I am more concerned about clarifying how X got into the victim’s room…

Meanwhile, @Restkastel, I dub thee “Pure Evil”.

1 Like

I would have declined as well, after all, it isn’t a properly formulated blue. It only was a single word and not a fully formed argument.

If there was a properly formulated blue, then we would be forced to.

Perhaps I can present my closing argument, and our hosts can strike back at it with whatever reds they please.

A couple of years ago, one of the employees did not participate on his official company holiday. Someone else boarded the cruise in his stead… mystery assassin X.

This poor employee was not left without a cruise, however, as he went on the same cruise at a different time that year.

Mystery assassin X, who had been waiting on the boat for years, finally made his move during the most recent cruise. While he was not present on board at midnight – perhaps he was taking a swim or was on a different boat at the moment – later that night he entered the victim’s room.

As for how he entered the victim’s room, he could’ve stolen a key from someone, or perhaps picked the lock. Or perhaps he had a key of his own that he obtained before the holiday even began.

Inside the victim’s room, he stabbed his unconscious victim in the leg. The victim did not wake up, because he had been injected with a knockout drug that kept him unconscious until after sunrise.

(also, I love the question mark in “A little nugget of anti-mystery [GAME4] [SOLVED?]”)

1 Like

I’ll make it official!
!

Karifean already did make it official if you didn’t notice Antra~ It is a nice title.

Or he could have been simply knocked Unconscious as I’ve detailed in previous blues.

True. Additionally, should a drug have been used, it could’ve been administered through other means than injection, as well.

I suppose from what I recall from the records of truth this is close enough this time. I simply figured that a bit of cruelty would spice up this game for everyone.

With that I shall bring this game to a close.

The Witches Senate accepts the theory put forward by @midsummer as the truth of the matter!

Perhaps we will meet again when something else cries~

…Repeat it in red: This game really is over.

I’m still curious why exactly somebody figured he should stab the victim in the leg and then just leave.
Probably just thinking too hard about it though. :stuck_out_tongue: