And need I remind everyone who put us in this mess in the first place? It would be Wonderlander himself. He picked Pockety without asking her if she would be fine with it, which resulted in her telling everyone to downvote her. Which is what left us in this position of either having to topdeck or having to accept whatever @Rabla picked.
I honestly think that Wonderlander is trying to force a topdeck and also use this opportunity to throw shade on both Rabla and whoever he chose to be chancellor so that he could discredit people that he, as a King, would know are Progressives, as that is the only sense this makes at least in my eyes.
It has seemed for a while now that Wonderlander has been making decisions based on information that the rest of us do not have. @pictoshark noticed this a while back and commented on it, and this really seems to add more fuel to the fire for that theory, at least in my opinion.
I might be wrong though, so I would like to hear what other people have to say regarding the odd record that Wonderlander has when it comes to voting and the like. Can anyone else think of an alternate interpretation to what I just proposed? I would love to hear it in case the game continues due to being dealt triple King. It would not hurt to have more information and theories.
(Sorry about triple post, I kept thinking of things to say right after finishing the last post.)