Judging from the way things are going, and the fact that either @akafa123 or @pictoshark is an OTK, I think voting no is definitely the safest option here by far.
I PICKED HAT BECAUSE WE HAVE NO INFO ON HER.
WE ARE NOT IN OYASHIRO TERRITORY!
CHRIST! I WAKE UP TO THIS!
Blabla discourse wants me to type more bla.
The vote has concluded! Here are the results.
- @UsagiTenpura voted NO
- @Blackrune voted NO
- @akafa123 voted YES
- @PictoShark voted YES
- @Restkastel voted NO
- @StarTurner voted NO
- @PocketyHat voted NO
- @thesorceress voted YES
- @Wonderlander voted YES
- @Rabla voted NO
4 YES to 6 NO. The government fails!
Current game status
One True King policies played: 1
Progressive policies played: 2
Next presidential privilege unlocked by OTK policy: Investigation
Previous government: akafa123 and Rabla
Remaining policies in stock: 8
Failed Governments in a row: 1 / 3
Nomination Phase
@Restkastel, you are the current presidential candidate, please nominate a chancellor. Do note that akafa123 and Rabla cannot be nominated as chancellors since they were part of the previous government. Feel free to take your time and discuss the results of the previous government phase with your fellow council members, but once youâve made up your mind regarding a chancellor, please state their name in bold. The voting starts immediately as soon as you make your decision. You have 24 hours to choose someone.
thank god.
I think the people that we still need information on at all are @StarTurner and @PocketyHat.
Considering that Pockety hasnt been talking at all that seems like a bad bet to take considering that she was voted down before, and while I am tempted to test someone, it may end up a moot point in the long run anyway.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to who I should perhaps pick for Chancellor? Im split between picking someone for information and picking someone who might be safe so that we could ensure that we have a progressive policy if one is drawn.
Does anyone have any suggestions on the matter? I would especially like to hear from @UsagiTenpura and @Blackrune since they were presidents in the governments who passed Progressives, and they did not vote yes for that last government. Everyone is welcome to throw their two cents in of course, but I especially value their opinions.
May I also mention that the fact that @akafa123 voted for Picto is shady as all hell.
1 Like
Haha, I thought no one would vote for picto even he himself, so I voted just for lulz. 
@Restkatel
2 Likes
Discourse strikes again.
Oops, somehow managed to post much to early by accident, but anyway, @Restkastel I agree, I havenât been either a President or a Chancellor, so either testing me or @PocketyHat can be a good idea, or anyone that has a good track record should be fine, or meta.
Now that I look at it since @StarTurner is the next president so I likely -will not- be picking him as Chancellor.
This either leaves the unlikely choice of @PocketyHat, picking the meta choice @Blackrune or perhaps picking @UsagiTenpura since she also had a Progressive policy implemented and is very active in the discussion.
Any thoughts on the matter?
1 Like
I sure hope the investigation result wasnât just for the lulz, too.
Considering @StarTurner and @PocketyHat are next in line for a chance at being president, giving them chancellor now might not be the best move. I mean sure, if it doesnât work out we could just skip them then, I guess, but Iâd prefer a safer pick. Iâd probably agree to @UsagiTenpura or @Wonderlander.
1 Like
I would say who you should pick, but since you think Iâm a King, I wonât say who I prefer.
Menawhile, can everyone PLEASE not forget this post: Rokkenjima Secret Oyashiro III [Finished - One True Kings Victory]
@akafa123 has been seen dropping blatant signals to Oyashiro. Iâm just saying.
Do not forget that this could all be a very convoluted plan to make you trust me, by having akafa out themselves as a King, and then accuse me of being a King.
We could both be Kings. That is one of the possibilities.
Or theres the possibility that @akafa123 just likes lolis and was being honest about their desires. Considering who we are talking about here I wouldnât put it past Akafa.
Not every offhand comment has meaning after all. It could be a signal, or it could just be him revealing his kink for the world to see. I know that if that radical policy had mentioned something about monster girls or angel uniforms etc I would have said something similar.
Not lolis, but I like maido girls! 
2 Likes
I wouldnât, Iâd stay my hand, not wanting to approve of anything King related. A key part of playing on the Progressive team in this game is to keep the trust of your allies, as if they think youâre a King then you know their attention is in the wrong place, which will impede your teams progress.
People are human, Picto. Making an offhanded comment like this once when it applies to your tastes is rather natural. Not everyone is just aimed solely on winning and would rather just have a good time while they play instead. This, at least as far as I can tell, is one of those times.
It is, at the very least, an alternate interpretation that cannot be ignored as there is not sufficient evidence to dismiss it entirely yet. There is still the possibility that you are the OTK in that conflict and Akafa is simply horsing around a bit and enjoying playing the game.
1 Like
Meh, I guess I basically KNOW that theyâre a King, and youâre not privy to that information so I see why youâd see it that way.
But to me. Thatâs a signal. No doubt about it.
And to the outside it seems like you protest too much comparatively to how you were talking about before how you both could be OTK. You seemed a lot more middle ground and willing to acknowledge any possibility there. However, in this case you seem to be denying this possibility far more than the others.
I will mention this seems very suspicious to me, and if it is the truth I will accept it later if there is more information to support it. But until then, I will be considering all possibilities, and the fact that you are not willing to acknowledge it and are actively arguing against that possibility just seems a bit suspicious to me considering your past behavior when it comes to these things.
Thereâs a saying, actions speak louder than words. You can say what you think, and what you want others to believe or not believe, but how you act will determine things better, and if your actions donât match your words, then things become obvious. Only time will tell, as this game has gone so slowly.
1 Like
I see, thatâs why you all gave me an opportunity to act, right?
#Oh wait you fucking didnât
Not that Iâm mad or anything, itâs just if you donât vote me in there, youâd better never vote me in.