Another little nugget of a mystery [GAME 2] [SOLVED]

The revolver with him may be a large handgun.
So therefore **The man’s search for any entrances and exits was foiled because the revolver in his hand blocked sight of a door or open window as he searched.**
Everyone who has ever played an FPS knows what I’m talking about here. Something in the corner of your vision that you cannot see because your gun’s vies model blocks it. This is the same in real life.

Also suppose The entrance the accomplice used was one that was created during or after the man’s search for entrances and exits, such as a window being opened or a door being unbarred.

Can’t come up with much else tbh. So if the gun wasn’t fired the man was incapitated by a surprise attack? Hmmhmmhmm…that gives me some ideas, but the accomplice needs to get into the bank first.

On an unrelated note, sudden migraines would not be something a doctor could forsee, so my above blue concerning a sudden ailment still stands.

If you want I’ll make it more specific: The man was prevented from going through with his plans by an illness, disease, sickness or other ailment that was sudden, was not in the man’s medical history and did not come up in the medical appointment before the incident, such as exploding head syndrome.

Also, does the red truth concerning reflect shots apply to throwable items as well? What about a fragmentation grenade that blew off one of the man’s legs but did not kill him? How about a standard run of the mill rock?These aren’t in blue since I think reflect shots covers these, but I want to make sure.

You forgot a few, lol
If I’m not busy tonight I might just make avpost of truth giving all the reds

Before I move forward with responding to people’s theories I thought I’d point out an issue I can see with this image.

The red truth about the second set of demands refers to EVERYONE, not just those within the bank.

Apart from that, nice picture!

Now…

To tackle these blues…

I didn’t include those that said something like I deny your theory, since it doesn’t clearly says anything in red.

One I can think of is “the accomplice didn’t use any reflect shots his weapons” or however it was worded, to go against what I said to get around how the accomplice didn’t enter. I remember I considered saying he stole a grenade off a security guard, but couldn’t think of why the guard wouldn’t throw it himself and abandoned that theory.

Wait, which one is it?

Re-read the red regarding the doctor appointment.

The doctor was correct in his assessment.

No additional entrances were created after the man’s search.

The man did not make this mistake.

Fine. The accomplice is a human

#Seems sudden is an alien word to this man

Also I did say during as well but I’ll assume that’s an oversight and move on

MIGRAINES HAVE A PRIOR CAUSE YOU NIMWIT!

Seriously… to think he’s related to me.

I’m talking, like, a piece of dust getting in his eye that makes him have to blink so the accomplice can run in in the time he is blinking. The example I’m giving aren’t definitive: it could be literally any ailment.

Also was it the accomplice didn’t use entrances the man knew about or the man would see if he did? I forget which.

Lol, classic “no THIS didn’t happen” instead of saying a more general “the man’s search for any entrances and exits was flawed”. Very suspicious. It seems quite possible someone did enter the building.

Hmm…really drawing a blank on this one.
The bank refers to a non-money bank such as a blood bank and since thean isn’t completely insane he knows he can’t rob £100,000 from a blood bank.
Wow, this really is hard. I’m not sure how to do this one. The accomplice seems entirely sealed down but I don’t think pictoshark would let thebsolution be a one step problem so I don’t think it’s something like [color=BLUE]wind making the man drop his gun or similar miraculous circumstances…[/COLOR]

Thing is, since pictoshark admitted to me he just typed “No” to my concussion grenades because he couldn’t come up with another way to respond at the time and there were other ways in Hindsight, I’ve dropped this sort of reasoning. Good to see someone here is still doing it though

Please define “secret entrance” in red and save us a lot of time laying down dumb blues. Otherwise I think I might be here over an hour.

Guys… What could have happened? Thinking backwards helps. The guy’s plan was foiled. How? The accomplice had the only means of going in without violating any red. But what if people inside the bank stopped him somehow? We have to think. What would cause the man to abandon his plan?

Okay, I updated it with all reds in this post. Even just denied theories, so now that I don’t have to upload it every time, you just can add it yourself in the paint or photoshop. Also corrected that one thing pictoshark pointed out.

The needed sum of money was gathered by people outside the bank, and given to the accomplice so as to not enter the bank and violate the man’s orders. The man and the accomplice then met up and left the bank together, but the money is still in possession of the accomplice and it hasn’t been given to the mafia yet!

Edit: NVM.

Sorry I asked this before saying one philanthropist. Search Above, but long story short the issue is the accomplice is a secret and remains a secret.

The Bank is a monetary bank.

I covered this…

If the man was thwarted, he was thwarted intentionally by a human

A secret entrance is a place to enter or exit the area in question that is not immediately recognisable as such by most people when being approached. (thanks to @Karifean for pulling this load for me)