Don’t think there’s a rule for it, but someone might think you’re talking about Maria and her…strange behavior if they only got up to episode 1. So it’s a lot more convenient that way
The man has diarrhea! He fully intends to blow up the bank and is capable of doing so, but due to being trapped in the bathroom for more than half an hour, he still hasn’t gotten around to pressing the button! He’s preoccupied by his bowel movement!
The man does not know how to discern the time from a watch! His radio watch was functioning correctly but he misread the time in such a manner that the detonation would occur later than planned, and this delay would be sufficient to keep the bank intact at the end of an hour!
(I am quite puzzled about the presence of the revolver… Something is fishy about it, you wouldn’t need a revolver if there were bombs surrounding the bank. Fishy!)
The accomplice interfered with the man’s plan! He entered the bank the moment he killed one of the innocent people inside, so there were always 3 people inside the bank! The accomplice entered through some space that was not secret but that the man had either not seen or had not recorded as an exit!The perpetrator (the person red truths refer to as “the man”) therefore did not cause the death of that person! The accomplice wrested the revolver away from the man and shot the detonator with it! Confirm in red that the detonator was intact by the end of the hour!
The man never killed anyone, sorry.
In the meantime, I was thinking something more serious than that for illness but thst works sortof. Though if he’s really determined he might just go out there.
PICTOSHARK is currently countering my sickness blue right now according to him so he’s a bit annoyed you’re posting a blue tangential to it already.
Still, whatever. He’ll probably say about it.
In case it was not clear, I was waiting on you to confirm this in red. It wouldn’t do if you tried to trick us into thinking this case is impossible just because you keep using the phrase ‘end of the incident’ and it turns out to refer to a completely unintuitive point in time, now would it? Kuhuhuhu…
The fact that the man did not kill does not matter! The accomplice could still have infiltrated the bank through the manner about exits I mentioned in a previous blue truth! The accomplice could have then willingly interfered with the man’s plans! None of the commands and/or demands so far have been directed towards the accomplice!
Perhaps:
The accomplice installed jammers in such a way that they kept the bombs from detonating! These jammers could have been installed inside or outside the bank!
Or perhaps:
The accomplice enters the bank and persuades the man that the man is holding a fake detonator. The accomplice then prevents the man from pressing the true detonator, exploiting the man’s “slightly clouded logic”! Due to the slightly clouded logic of the man, the accomplice could have gone about by any number of ways to trick, persuade, or convince the man to not believe the detonator in the man’s hands was the real one and moreover not press it!
edit: don’t forget to refute this post, @pictoshark ! 
The man needed that precise amount of money to repay a debt. Otherwise he would die. As a result of this he would not be tricked into taking less than he asked for.
The man had a checkup with his doctor just before he enacted his plan, and the doctor declared him to be of good health, with nothing abnormal wrong with him. The doctor was correct in this assessment
Not a single window was broken during the incident.
At the conclusion of the incident, the exterior of the bank was not damaged in any way that would necessitate repairs.
His request referred to money
The accomplice did not interfere with the bombs
The man does not have a bank account.
Oooh look this was answered higher up in the thread.
The man had a checkup with his doctor just before he enacted his plan, and the doctor declared him to be of good health, with nothing abnormal wrong with him. The doctor was correct in this assessment
Haaaaannnngghhh… Chaos really has it out for me today, doesn’t it…
The man had a checkup with his doctor just before he enacted his plan, and the doctor declared him to be of good health, with nothing abnormal wrong with him. The doctor was correct in this assessment
Okay.
It was.
The man did not misread the time at any point during the incident.
Actually that red is a bit weak…
How aboooooooooooooooooooooooooooooout:
The man was not mistaken about the time at any point during the incident.
GAK! Ummmm my memory is more complex than even the chaos I wish to bring about…
I forgot.
I confirm this definition.
I was waiting for you to realise that there’s already a red that counters it.
You failed my expectations, King of Nothing.
After learning that the bank had insufficient funds, the man decided to exploit the life insurance of his accomplice which met or exceeded the amount of money he needed to cover his debt! The accomplice and the man were related in such a way that it was definite the accomplice’s life insurance would be given to the man in event of the accomplice’s death! The accomplice went inside the bank and was wounded by the man! The accomplice, however, wasn’t dead yet by the end of the hour! The man exited the bank after wounding his accomplice, certain that the accomplice would die, in order to cover the tracks of his burglary attempt. The accomplice was met with medical care sufficient to let them survive, so the man didn’t kill anyone!
The objects positioned around the bank really are bombs, and if the man had pressed the switch they really would have detonated.
How?
We’ve been over this lots of times. I will not repeat myself, not for such a half baked theory. Chaos does not mean that you should take out the dish halfway through cooking!
I swear to Oyashiro that I already countered that…
One sec…
Are you talking about this blue?
I countered it with:
His vision is 20/20, and he can see.
#*SCREAMS INCOHERENTLY*
I WAS ABOUT TO PRESS SUBMIT
1 Like
One of the people n the bank had a bear pet, he can’t understand human speech and the man’s demands. So he was angry and attacked him!
The man could have simply not noticed a non-secret part of the bank that can be used as an entrance and an exit! Therefore, the accomplice could have entered the bank through an entrance that was not secret, nor was noted by the man as being an entrance! The man could have a relation with any number of civilians in the crowd with whom he could ensure that if they died he would receive their life insurance money, in the case that the accomplice did not enter the bank! Red truth states that there were other people besides the man throughout the incident in the bank, those people could have been the ones who were wounded by the measure of this blue truth (in whole or in part)!
The man, due to the stress of attempting armed robbery, developed a spontaneous placebo effect that he had diarrhea!
Just made sure it was visible. I wasn’t doubting your reading. Sorry ^^;
Guys, I think you’re getting way deep into gritty details and way too specific theories^^ How about we take a step back and examine what parts of the story we can pinpoint and what parts of the story are still vague (i.e. pictoshark refused to make a red statement or got awfully specific instead of making a more general red denial)?
I’d like to point something out about this. I think the revolver is fishy. If you had bombs, and if you have a detonator, why would you need a revolver?
Bombs can feel like an abstract threat to some people.
How?
Also I’ll give you guys a bonus little red.
The gun was never fired during the incident.
The man did not suffer any ill symptoms thanks to the placebo/nocebo effect during the incident.
GAK! Just saw this.
There were no pets in the bank at any point during the incident.
I made a summary for those who just arrived and dont want to read all 235 posts. Sorry if it’s a little bit weird, I used paint. Also for those who don’t want to reread all those posts, so poor pictoshark doesn’t have to repeat himself 1000 times.
4 Likes
The accomplice went in through the front door, back door, windows, roof, basement, vents, fire escape, hole in the wall, trash disposal chute!
I knew there was something you wrote above about a lot of things, hence why I ran into the red earlier about the bombs. This one is no different: I thought you wrote about accidents the manhood and wasn’t sure if you had wrote anything else on the matter.
The accomplice is something other than a human (animal,robot,alien) that could have just walked through one of the entrances the man did keep his eye on, but it still wouldn’t violate the red because the red says the man didn’t see anyone walking in, but anyone by definition refers to humans. So him being something other than guman would invalidate this red!
Come on PICTOSHAAAAAAARK!!! Let’s see you deny these!
Sorry I asked about drones before lol.
The accomplice did not use any remote controlled or automatic machines. He himself would count.