I argue it could have been a window on a higher story than the first that he did not consider and entrance or an exit due to the fact it would not normally be accessable. The accomplice used a ladder to get in.
The bank is a single floor.
The definition of a window being closed refers to the glass pane, and not covering bars. The man had a key to the bars which initially obstructed the window and made it not viable as an entrance or exit. The glass pane was open, however the bars were shut and the accomplice unlocked them and entered.
No such window with bars covering it exists in the bank.
There were curtains covering the window and the man did not move to open them. Thus he technically never witnessed the window itself existing.
Lol very true
Anyway Ill assume you saying you donât respond yet is equivalent to a lime, else you just threw the game lol
Anyway ill expand a little: you say now windows were opened then? A balcony on the second or third floor was used, with a metal staircase leading to it. youâd know what Iâm taking about if youâve seen it before, theyâre normally on workplace offices or cheap apartments. This balconyâs door was locked before and the glass was not breakable without the man firing a bullet from his gun, which he did not do to remain stealthy, so he didnât consider it an entrance or exit. The accomplice entered via this door with help from the owner of the key. No measures were taken to prevent the man from seeing the accomplice by the insider and since they are unaware they are not thwarting the manâs plans as referred to in blue above.
You liar you didnât see it all this time, I know you personally so donât try to lie like that. Whenever you lie to me ask yourself: did it work in the mafia game? I thought not.
well it almost did but thatâs different cos I was trying to trust you to block out my knowledge of you typing, if not for that I wouldâve totally lynched you after the aspy death
Okay enough about that. Iâve gotta ask myself how the man fucked up in getting someone to come over and ignore the second set of orders (which, by the way, has been typed so much it now autocompletes on my phone, so it did something useful for once).
I think higher up the thread I said he got a guy to light his cigarette and the man dropped the detonator. This was countered because whoever made the mans plans fail did so intentionally. So ill change the blue around a little.
The man has a smoking habit and received a lighter from a bank worker, who he told to ignore the â100m and all that crapâ and the worker responded by tackling the man to the floor in a Heroic act to âsave the dayâ. Hmm sounds good, though I think theres one hole in it that pictoshark will probably find fairly quick so itâs not getting bolded. Iâll try to come up with something else in the meantime.
GAK! Solved by Kari agaaaaaaaaain.
WHAT IS THIS!
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
Karifean reached the truth of the matter.
Derogatory term, why are the curtains on the outside of the bank? Explain or your board is null
I fucking considered the curtains then read above and saw the man circled the perimeter so I ignore curtains.
The man was inside the bank he did not witness the window outside the bank. He walked around the inside of the bank to see the window.
The bank has two other windows (so three in total), but only one can be opened, and it just so happened that that one had itâs curtains drawn this morning.
So the accomplice incapitated the man ok sure, but did you actually almost fuck up your own board? Like seriously
No.
What the hell is wrong with you? i did not almost fuck it up. Explain where I did that.
Hold a fucking second
Iâm gonna check this shit, I swear to God you are fucking wrong here, the man checked around the bank, not inside it
Fuck, to think I got close as well,but ignored it because of wording.
Iâll assume youâre right until I find this
These are the RECORD OF TRUTH:
The manâs accomplice betrayed him, jumping in through an open window and knocking the man out with a tranquilizer gun as he entered, before the man knew what was even happening. The blinds/curtains were closed obscuring the window so the man genuinely did not notice it was open.
When you said that the accomplice attacking man is blocked by the red truth that no-one disobeyed the orders.
Unless youâre gonna say âOh, I didnât quote that, so it doesnât countâ.
Tho I think you said should, but you shouldâve limed it since technically that blue was live after you posted
I am not having this argument with you. The players must realize if I claim a red counters a blue when it does not.
Well that was fun! Surprised at how long it took to solve, it seemed to simple from the beginning. Well I guess in hindsight itâs exactly as simple as it should be.
Whereâs the next one ^^
Later. My family is weird, our christmas starts tomorrow morning.
Or would you say today morning?
UmmmmmmâŚ
UhhhhhâŚ
I dunno
And if we did we would win instantly?
Or would you get a second chance?
In that case you could make hundreds of reds saying âtips, pencils, tipsâ and saying that Counters that, without giving us any info. Then we would obviously flood this saying no fuck off, but we could only gain that the blue is wrong and not why itâs wrong if we actually tried to solve it.
Though I know you wouldnât do that, someone else with this ruleset totally would.
ANYWAY
Ill have a look for said red truth About looking for entrances