Another little nugget of a mystery [GAME 2] [SOLVED]

Gameboards
#102

"significant damage to the structure of the bank"
this could be inside, not outside.
walls and roof would be okay, but floor may fall.

#103

Did the man know his accomplice was in the bank?

#104

Well ofc not, the accomplice was going against the plans

#105

Read above, @thesorceress you’ve given me an idea
The man was hypnotised into leaving the bank and the hypnosis applied for at least an hour, hence the man would not destroy the bank, kill himself or take other extreme actions within the hour

#106

The man knew the accomplice was in the bank, indeed, the original plan was likely for him to hold up the bank while the accomplice slipped out with the money unseen. He likely thought he could trust the accomplice, but it turned out to be false.

or on the other hand

The man did not know the accomplice was in the building, and thought he was outside, but he had slipped inside beforehand with the intent to take all the money for himself. Robbing the place while the culprit provided an ample distraction to the police. However, due to a pang of conscience or some other extenuating circumstance, the accomplice ended up either shooting the remote or otherwise incapacitating the culprit so that the bombs could not explode

#107

The accomplice was outside the bank at the start of the incident.

#108

He would have to destroy the button of the remote as it is specified that at all times if the buttons b was pressed the bombs would explode
This applies even if the button isn’t attached to the detonator
So maybe a blue about shooting the detonators button? Not sure here

#109

Obviously the person who he talked to at the counter, I don’t think anyone else got close enough

#110

Who hypnotised him then?

#111

Wow what why am I above

#112

LET’S DO THE TIME WARP AGAIN!

LET’S DO THE TIME WARP AGAIN!

LET’S DO THE TIME WARP AGAIN!

I’m not sorry.

#113

That would count as thwarting his plan, riiiiiiight?

#114

Nah the hypnosis started before he made the demands fully

#115

Accomplice shot the detonator.
Accomplice stole the money, so perpetrator went after him.

#116

The man was not hypnotised.

#117

The accomplice was originally on the roof of the bank, which is technically the outside. The Accomplice entered through a rooftop duct that the killer was not aware of, but due to the fact that it was not hidden does not count as a secret passage. Alternatively, a new passage could have been created by damaging the roof of the building or a structural default in the walls, all of which are non-secret entrances the culprit would not have been aware of

#118

@Restkastel bottom part doesn’t apply unless damages weren’t visible from the outside somehow

#119

Also what about my blue with floor falling on them? :cry:

#120

The killer is in the building, he wouldn’t see new damages from the inside.

#121

It says
"At the conclusion of the incident, the exterior of the bank was not damaged in any way that would necessitate repairs."
So the roof would be repaired if it had a hole in it after accident