Only the top is valid, the man didn’t change his mind About going through with the plan, this was stated above.
Still like that top one
1 Like
Don’t do my job for me maggot Thanks for that.
Your theory simply did not occur. That’s the only way I can respond.
The man was not hit through a wall.
1 Like
What do you mean by intact? Like completely untouched?
1 Like
Do you mean in the original narrative?
1 Like
not hit through a wall you say?
How about being hit around a wall?
**The weapon used by the accomplice is capable of reflect shots.
Or alternatively and far less ridiculously, The weapon was a set of concussion grenades or knockout gas grenades.
1 Like
Yes, about the bank.
No.[quote=“akafa123, post:87, topic:885, full:true”]
Yes, about the bank.
[/quote]
I’d say that it was not damaged in any way that would necessitate repairs
Whatever the man needed money for was changed, then. If he needed it to pay ransom money, the person was killed. If he needed it to pay for an operation, the person died. His need for the money was nullified.
The money was a debt
Which we don’t know the conditions behind.
Oh right, almost forgot something.
If it is then the accomplice did not do any.
I’ll solidify this in the red: At the conclusion of the incident, the exterior of the bank was not damaged in any way that would necessitate repairs.
The only way I can think of a debt would be cancelled if it was a debt he couldn’t be bankrupted over would.be the loaner dying. So we could.make that a blue, but I don’t seeit being the final goal
The person that needed the money from him, arrived at the scene and accomplice killed him. Then he didnt need money anymore, so he left the bank.
It was a debt to a large Mafia family. This family was not involved in the incident outside of this, and this Mafia family were still in a position to want the money by the end of the incident.
So the interior was damaged? Hmm so gunshots probsbly went off, let’s think about that
Completely unrelated:
An irrational phobia, such as a fear of lightning, caused the man to leave.
Though I think this is already covered…
Le~aping to concluuuuuuusions!
The man possess no irrational fears.
The accomplice, who the directives were not aimed at, was actually inside the bank the entire time. The reason that he was keeping it a secret was so that the people didn’t get wise to the fact that the accomplice was actually inside the bank. He then proceeded to foil the culprit’s plan as he himself did not need as much money and was perfectly satisfied with taking what was on hand
But I’m right, aren’t I? Hmmhmmhmm…Let’s continue…
[color=blue]The man attempted and failed at suicide.[/Color]
Bombs actually went off, exterior wasn’t damaged, but maybe second floor fell on everyone and they got trapped there but not killed
Nah he stated One bomb would cause significant damage and the bombs weren’t tampered with