I was under the impression that we’d basically completely established that.
The man was fooled into thinking that he had received the amount that he had requested with fake bills provided by means that I had mentioned earlier. The accomplice was the one who produced them as he was not truly working for the culprit and was really a police plant or something similar. His motive however is rather irrelevant.
Oh andy he currency front…
The man might not have received a different currency that had the same value as £100.000. On the contrary, the man received a different type of currency that had a different value than £100.000! Let me elaborate. We know the man asked for 100.000 pounds. Not British Pounds. He could have asked for Syrian Pounds! And Syrian Pounds rate might be low enough for the bank to have 100.000 in Syrian Pounds! They gave the money and bam, the man didn’t blow anything up!
Accomplice came inside and lied about police or mafia gang coming, so they ran away together.
Guys we need to say how the accomplice got in. We know he didn’t use any standard entrances as he did not enter any entrances the man knew about.
If only it was that small an amount…
Counter!
The man never saw anyone pass through any of the entrances in and out of the bank, and he would have seen if anyone passed through an entrance he knew of.
Next!
The man was not given any fake money.
Next!
The man never saw anyone pass through any of the entrances in and out of the bank, and he would have seen if anyone passed through an entrance he knew of.
There are no secret entrances to the bank.
The accomplice entered through a vent in the building, perhaps on the roof, perhaps somewhere else. He would not have had to start on the roof as he was able to make his way through the hundred meter radius as the commands did not apply to him.
I didn’t say that he came in throught the main entrance or secret, he could have entered through emergency exit that the man didnt know about. Why?
Accomplice entered through emergency exit or some window on another side of the bank. Accomplice is lying and saying that he saw police or mafia gang approaching, so they need to leave from that side or emergency exit.
The man suffers from dementia worse than @pictoshark and forgot about what he was doing. That way he didn’t have a change of heart - he never knew what he was there for in the first place!
The vents were too tight for a human to fit through
The man walked around the whole inside of the bank at one point, taking note of all of the potential entrances and exits he could see.
The accomplice was outside when he finished this check.
The man does not suffer from any memory inhibiting conditions
Still doesn’t counter anything from my theory.
He took notes on all exits. Then accomplice entered through another exit that he noted. He entered it that way so he wouldnt be seen by supposedly approaching mafia or police. He lied about it and they escaped.
The man would have seen the accomplice entering if the accomplice entered through an entrance that he knew about, as he was keeping his eyes on all of them.
And yet, the red claims that the man never saw anyone pass through any of the entrances in and out of the bank.
Therefore the accomplice could not have entered through an entrance that the man knew about.
The accomplice entered through what thean asked was an exit, bit it could also be used as an entrance.
The accomplice is not a human!
If the man saw this exit then he would notice it’s ability to be used as an entrance and note it in his mind as an entrance and an exit.
Then what is the accomplice?
What???
Something small enough to fit through the vents to get in the bank, like a rodent or a small animal!
The accomplice is too big to fit through the vents
If "The man never saw anyone pass through any of the entrances in and out of the bank, and he would have seen if anyone passed through an entrance he knew of."
and “The man walked around the whole inside of the bank at one point, taking note of all of the potential entrances and exits he could see.” apply.
Then the man took notes of all entrances and exits. If someone would enter he would see it. Therefore,
No one entered the bank, during the incident, besides people that were already inside.