@thesorceress the bombs were NOT tampered with, if the button was pressed, th y would explode.
…Hold on.
The man demanded payment in Pounds, however he was given the sum in a different currency, meaning he did not receive the sum he requested but instead something similar that was cash.
[color=blue]
Battler came and ate all bombs, so they exploded inside him.
[/color]
If that red isn’t sufficient in your eyes, then I’ll go for a chokeslam while I’m at it!
The man did NOT receive the payment in a different currency that had the same value as £100,000.
Okay, let’s reverse the chessboard. The fact that he is alive means that he got the £100.000. We know that the bank had no such money, so it must have come from outside. But the only means of that money is the accomplice so…
I don’t remember if this was covered before but here goes…
The police procured the money or something that looked like money to fool the accomplice. The only means of the money getting in was the accomplice, and the accomplice took inside the money. But the only way our guy would know the police came was the accomplice giving him a signal. And he could not give a signal when he didn’t know the police was coming. So the police caught him by surprise and apprehended him before they could blow the bomb up
I was under the impression that we’d basically completely established that.
The man was fooled into thinking that he had received the amount that he had requested with fake bills provided by means that I had mentioned earlier. The accomplice was the one who produced them as he was not truly working for the culprit and was really a police plant or something similar. His motive however is rather irrelevant.
Oh andy he currency front…
The man might not have received a different currency that had the same value as £100.000. On the contrary, the man received a different type of currency that had a different value than £100.000! Let me elaborate. We know the man asked for 100.000 pounds. Not British Pounds. He could have asked for Syrian Pounds! And Syrian Pounds rate might be low enough for the bank to have 100.000 in Syrian Pounds! They gave the money and bam, the man didn’t blow anything up!
Accomplice came inside and lied about police or mafia gang coming, so they ran away together.
Guys we need to say how the accomplice got in. We know he didn’t use any standard entrances as he did not enter any entrances the man knew about.
If only it was that small an amount…
Counter!
The man never saw anyone pass through any of the entrances in and out of the bank, and he would have seen if anyone passed through an entrance he knew of.
Next!
The man was not given any fake money.
Next!
The man never saw anyone pass through any of the entrances in and out of the bank, and he would have seen if anyone passed through an entrance he knew of.
There are no secret entrances to the bank.
The accomplice entered through a vent in the building, perhaps on the roof, perhaps somewhere else. He would not have had to start on the roof as he was able to make his way through the hundred meter radius as the commands did not apply to him.
I didn’t say that he came in throught the main entrance or secret, he could have entered through emergency exit that the man didnt know about. Why?
Accomplice entered through emergency exit or some window on another side of the bank. Accomplice is lying and saying that he saw police or mafia gang approaching, so they need to leave from that side or emergency exit.
The man suffers from dementia worse than @pictoshark and forgot about what he was doing. That way he didn’t have a change of heart - he never knew what he was there for in the first place!
The vents were too tight for a human to fit through
The man walked around the whole inside of the bank at one point, taking note of all of the potential entrances and exits he could see.
The accomplice was outside when he finished this check.
The man does not suffer from any memory inhibiting conditions
Still doesn’t counter anything from my theory.
He took notes on all exits. Then accomplice entered through another exit that he noted. He entered it that way so he wouldnt be seen by supposedly approaching mafia or police. He lied about it and they escaped.
The man would have seen the accomplice entering if the accomplice entered through an entrance that he knew about, as he was keeping his eyes on all of them.
And yet, the red claims that the man never saw anyone pass through any of the entrances in and out of the bank.
Therefore the accomplice could not have entered through an entrance that the man knew about.
The accomplice entered through what thean asked was an exit, bit it could also be used as an entrance.
The accomplice is not a human!
If the man saw this exit then he would notice it’s ability to be used as an entrance and note it in his mind as an entrance and an exit.