If you guys are voting against killing anyone, don’t say “No Vote” please, I will take that as you unvoting. Instead, vote for “No Death” or “No Lynch”.
You’re right, but remember something. Every human wins if we as a team ultimately win. I’m willing to put myself in this position because I feel like this is at my most useful. If you are human, I wish to convince you that I am as well. But what matters most is that we focus on getting each person one by one. I find your early actions suspicious but i’m willing to think that you were just trying to see what would happen.
You don’t need to believe I’m human. Just think about my suggestions. Once we narrow the people and get more information, I hope to formulate a sound theory for every human to read
Oh hey Muski is around and did things. Yeah I kind of agree with King on this one. Although I’m not so sure about the argument that witches would have told them not to do that. We don’t really know about the witch’s level of coordination in this game.
Also akafa’s playstyle does seem different from last game. Kinda reminds me more of that Secret Oyashiro round. (where akafa was evil) I don’t really find it that suspicious though, could just be a lapse in motivation or bad timing.
1 Like
Now for your opinions and my thoughts on them.
Rabla: Him avoiding conversation and answering questions is suspicious. If we question him, ask him anything you feel is worth concerning about. That includes everyone playing including myself.
Midsummer: i guess gut reaction makes sense. I hope he can be more defined with how he is.
Usagi: Personally, I want to trust Usagi, but this is mafia so I can’t hope to trust anyone. However, she doesn’t seem to be suspicious as well.
Thesorceress: I think she’s suspicious with her leaning on a lynch when the game only started 3 hours. I felt like she’s too hasty. That and she’s a really good actress in these mafia games so I’m torn. Cautiously Neutral for me
Good information to know nonetheless.
What do you mean by acting weird? Not you but sorceress noticed it too (and seems like Blackrune as well). I roleplayed last time because there were roles, but now I don’t really know what to say now. 
(Also I didn’t talk during Oyashiro almost at all because I had to prepare for exams)
Sorry, I meant to say NO LYNCH instead of “NO VOTE”. I see some of you used the argument “you behave differently than you usually do” which is pretty meta… but then again - I don’t see many ways of gathering information at this point.
Honestly, might as well bring on the pressure.
Vote: Rabla
This one won’t budge until they themselves convince me.
I don’t mind people considering me suspicious on gut instinct at this point in the game - we have little to go on other than gut instinct, and I have been talking quite a lot. I do wonder what you mean by “being more defined with how he is”, though.
My current position is that I lack the experience to read people’s playstyles well enough to come up with reliable witch reads based on that, and there’s precious little solid information to go by. There are people I’m more suspicious about than others, but nobody sets off enough flags for me to really believe there’s a high probability they’re witches. I guess for now my number one witch read is Antra, on the grounds that it seems likely to me that one of the more active accusers is a witch, and he hasn’t responded to a thing or two I have said that I would’ve expected him to respond to. But I’m the first one to admit that’s pretty flimsy. The reason why I’m paying the closest attention to Antra also probably comes from me talking to him directly early on, which means his reactions and words have been in my mind more.
Like everyone else, I agree we have to lynch someone. In the absence of strong witch reads, I prefer going for the person whose death seems most potentially informative. For now, it is Rabla, and Rabla fits my other lynch criteria as well. I’d prefer going for less active people first since that leaves us with more information in the endgame. I dislike lynching new players immediately without a strong reason, but Rabla is no newbie.
If you want more gut instinct reads on people, I’m afraid those just aren’t my style. I usually don’t feel confident in my reads unless there’s some logic behind them that is based on things that happened previously.
I think contextual history is interesting for new players like me. I agree that’s a bit suspicious, but to my recollection most mafia players know that those who call lynch earliest always face suspicion. I also sort of think people had just wanted to move the game along as fast as possible. I’m still neutral, sorry.
AMF also talked about how Pliskin was suspicious. Curious to see how he’s going to defend himself. I
I did
I still strongly suspect AMF. Especially because they seem to be playing a chameleon (they change strategies depending on the group). They sort of give up too easily. Does that make sense? They seem to just let the crowd sway them and haven’t really advanced the game.
Hmmmm. That’s a tidy answer, and I can’t say you’re wrong.
What’s your read on me, I’m curious?
Omg… I had just realized I accidentally said your name instead of Rabla’s because I’m still a little shaky on the quotation system. I got you mixed up. I’m going to have to slide my answer to neutral.
oh lol. It’s fine.
How long we got guys?
Just wondering to see how long I’ve got to stay up for this.
Around 17-18 hours if im not mistaken
I feel like I might be rising to some bait here, but is it weird to be swayed by other people at a time with so little information? There’s no reason to limit my thinking with a closed mind right now, especially since I feel like a lot of the other players are better at this than I am.
Mind you, you still have no reason not to suspect me, just as I have no reason not to suspect you, so I won’t hold it against you.
Change Vote: AMF