Congratulations on stating the obvious.
You argue that shooting randomly yields a 60% chance of killing a progressive, huh?
I disagree. If we shoot @Wonderlander Iâm pretty sure thatâs a 100% chance of hitting a King.
Kuhuhuhuhu
If weâre going to propose dumb ideas, why not just downvote every single governments and pray that we get a progressive policies picked up in the randomness of the draw.
Iâd much rather we pick up the worst possible idea if weâre to go with a bad idea anyway.
(note : do not actually do this)
awwww I thought youâd be totally on board with thisâŚ
Still, @Blackrune? What do you think of this?
I think itâs possible akafa doesnât see the downsides either and is just doing whatever.
Maybe youâre OTK, and akafa (who is Oyashiro) just messed you up big time, and now youâre trying to save it somehow.
If akafa hadnât randomly voted YES for you afterwards I might be more convinced of this.
If I remember correctly you were the one that brought up the possibility that both of you are OTK though. That might not be something youâd want to draw attention to if that was actually the case. (then again, bringing it up as a progressive is equally weird since you should know itâs not a worthwhile possibility to discuss)
Iâll have to take a night to think about this.
Iâm pretty sure this proves weâre on the darkest world line. Waiting for 8 hours?
UggggggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhâŚ
I think either putting me or Restkastel as chancellor should be safe, maybe Rest more so. Usagiâs starting to say things I donât agree with, like whoâs safe and who could be an OTK, some of which seems to be the exact other way around, so I think Usagi and Wonderlander arenât good choices.
I said youâd be a good choice.
Twice
Care to explain?
You also said I might be an OTK. Could you give a definitive answer for me? I had to go through 120ish posts this morning, so maybe Iâve gotten things mixed up.
If we assume no presidents have lied since the reshuffle, then this strategy has a 12/15 chance of succeeding.
So you know, keep that in mind.
Kuhuhuhuhu
I did not say that.
I canât give a definitive answer for you, especially now that you both accuse me and push for Restkastel, sorry to say so.
I would like to hear why Restkastel is a good idea.
The only person I said I was certain to be an OTK is akafa.
I said Iâm betting that thesorceress, blackrune and pictoshark are progressives.
Finally I said I didnât know about others.
The events that followed, however, Iâll admit makes me only certain of thesorceress by now.
@pictoshark I actually thought of that after, it may not be a really bad idea, but I doubt everyone would go for it.
Essentially we have 3 draws as hope to get a single progressive policy. So basically the idea would come down to putting all our trust in the next draw.
This is a lot more likely to succeed if pocketyhat is also a progressive, but even so itâd have actually fairly good chance of succeeding (about even odds I think?), unless both pocketyhat and thesorceress are OTK, but I find this extremely unlikely.
Still with the way many people have been voting, Iâm sorta under the impression that a failed vote is unlikely, much less like 5 in a row this would require.
Well, you said 3/5 of me, Rest, and a few others were OTK. What makes you so certain that Blackrune Pictoshark and thesorceress are progressives? Only blackrune is very likely to be one, as he was investigated. To be fair though, that probably doesnât give me or Restkastel more credit than them, but I donât see why Rest is a bad idea either, ultimately we lack enough real information to make anything decisive, so I guess itâll be Blackruneâs choice in the end.
3 in a row actually.
What pictoshark and me are talking about is downvoting every single governments until the game ends and counting on the 3 failed draws to pick up a single progressive policy.
Which requires 5 failed governments.
âŚwouldnât that require 9 then. Iâm lost.
Dunno, maybe? I didnât think it would go back to zero after weâd randomly draw a policy. That makes it even worst tho if itâs the case.
NINE FAILED GOVERNMENT
Thatâs definitively mark the history of this game forever. But then what? Weâd like play for 2 more weeks just downvoting govsâŚ
Again, this is the worst and dumbest idea lol.
This is simple maths.
I know Iâm a progressive.
So if I trust 3 people, and distrust one, the other remaining 5 has to have 3 OTK in them.
Even if I swap pictoshark and akafa around, the result is the same for this.
There is no reason to trust Restkastel. They only passed a single OTK policy. The result of their investigation, in the end, is private to themselves and does not alter trust or mistrust in any ways. There is no clear reason to distrust them, but it makes it weird if a bunch of people suddenly start to trust someone with no reason.
Youâre asking me to justify my trust/distrust, but youâre not justifying anything about Restkastel.
But again, I know I am a progressive, and thesorceress pushed for me to be chosen as chancellor. She wouldnât do that if she was a radical. This is not something you may be able to trust but I do because I can trust myself. Outside of that tho, she has consistently trusted blackrune and myself, who are like it or not the ones who have the most reasons to be trusted given our records.
As for trusting Blackrune, he took part in two governments that passed progressive policies and doubted the government of pocketyhat and myself enough to vote against it, which I think is a proper move for a progressive to do, but not going to get back into this.
I see⌠I like this reasoning more than what youâve previously said, and I have nothing to really justify, and I think I see what you mean. In which case, itâs probably best to put thesorceress as chancellor.
They cant be, she was a part of the previous government if I recall correctly.