A viable tactic that I still stand by.
My argument was that my drunken vote presents the possibility where you were Oyashiro, but I was a progressive.
Right, at this point this was all you said.
A possibility.
Now letās watch a few posts after.
This is the post youāre talking about right?
You may notice itās a reply to a specific post.
Why donāt you check which one?
Then whereās the rest of your āpileā?
Oh right, your drunken vote.
And letās not forget you dodged the point that your drunken vote in itself is strong evidence that youāre the least qualified person to suggest people donāt joke around for a vote.
Are you serious? Are you breaking down this post this much.
The metaphorical pile isnāt just mine. It consists of other peopleās posts that incriminate you, and a pile can be one item high.
Seriously? Splitting hairs over this?
Just because Iām āunqualifiedā to say something, I shouldnāt post it, even if itās correct?
Okay, thatās a VERY odd way of playing. Iāll keep in mind this unique strategy of yours.
I could post evidence of you being enough of a smartass with various players here that you kinda are not qualified to cry over this and I could potentially post the PM you sent me that proves it.
Ihi.
If we want to continue this, Iād rather take it off thread.
Kid gloves off.
Tell me this. Name one time I used my smartassness to tell someone to stop speaking, against someone or in a situation where that someone would take it seriously. You goddamned hypocrite. āHere is this thing you shouldnāt do. Watch while I do it.ā
If you respond about this disagreement in this thread again, then youāre veering the topic way off course, and making it harder for people to read the thread. Iād advise continuing this in the aforementioned PM thread.
Okay?
You two seriously need to calm down. I mean, I know thatās not very helpful in this situation, but neither is anything that is happening during this conversation.
I was calm, even having fun until Usagiās most recent post. Donāt worry Iām bipolar af, Iāll forgive Usagi real soon, I promise!
The vote has concluded! Here are the results.
- @UsagiTenpura voted NO
- @Blackrune voted YES
- @akafa123 voted YES
- @PictoShark voted NO
- @Restkastel voted NO
- @StarTurner voted NO
- @PocketyHat voted NO
- @thesorceress voted NO
- @Wonderlander voted YES
- @Rabla voted NO
3 YES to 7 NO; the vote fails! The populace is getting a little frustratedā¦
Current game status
One True King policies played: 3
Progressive policies played: 4!
Next presidential privilege unlocked by OTK policy: Onikakushi
Previous government: thesorceress and Blackrune
Remaining policies in stock: 6
If Oyashiro is elected chancellor, the One True Kings win instantly.
Failed votes in a row: 2 / 3
Nomination Phase
@Rabla, you are the current presidential candidate, please nominate a chancellor. Do note that thesorceress and Blackrune cannot be nominated as chancellors since they were part of the previous government. Feel free to take your time and discuss the results of the previous government phase with your fellow council members, but once youāve made up your mind regarding a chancellor, please state their name in bold. The voting starts immediately as soon as you make your decision. You have 24 hours to choose someone.
Oh my god, what a shock! I totally expected to get voted up.
Itās currently 3am so forgive me if this is short or just overall uneducated, I hadnāt finished my re-read of a lot of the thread yet so I may not be completely correct in my place of mind. As a council member I feel itād be too unprofessional of me to not respond at all until my late morning wake.
While I whittle down the few people I feel can be trusted, I want to ask a question to the No voters, which is most of you, and thatās whether the deciding factor in your votes was Wonderlander or PocketyHatās seat. Theoretically, I find Pocket kind of viable to be safe, especially with her confidence to turn down a nomination. If your problem was just with Wonderlander, we could try her again.
Nowā¦ I do also want to ask for some personal assistance. My absence from two parts of the game shouldnāt endanger you all, and I want to have a wider view on everyones positions. Letās seeā¦ @pictoshark, you like to talk, why donāt you tell me who you trust at this point. And for safety, another opinionā¦ @StarTurner, perhaps? You were a successful progressive President a while back.
I could also do my usual safety dance and nominate @Restkastel, fixer of the bad times, depending on if heās being seen in a good light by the people I asked. If I recall, you had some doubts about me during my absence, and the fact I was involved in that unfortunate āKingsā debacle. Perhaps itās time to win your trust back?
Also, legitimately, Iām surprised no-one changed the name of the Progressive side. I thought for sure someone would have jumped at that.
I think it was because Pockety wasnāt willing to be nominated to a degree. She was too suspicious of Wonderlander to be comfortable of it. Your absence probably would put you in that same category. Honestly I would be advocating skipping you if it were not for putting it between you and a topdeck, and frankly the chances of getting a prog from an unknown president as long as the chancellor is decent is better than a topdeck at the moment probably.
Id like arguments about anyone else nominated as a chancellor, like Ive said in the past.
I think @akafa123 is a milquetoast King.
I think @Wonderlander is a King.
I trust @Restkastel @Blackrune and @UsagiTenpura (Iām mad she took my posts so seriously last night, overall I trust her the least out of the three but you know)
Unfortunately, the nature of the game is betrayal, and it seems likely that Oyashiro is amongst those that we trust.
Thatās why I went for my bizarre āVote in @akafa123 strategyā as I think heās not Oyashiro despite me knowing that heās a King
Honestly, you should rank those that your trust, and choose second place as your chancellor. That would probably be the best move.[quote=āRabla, post:618, topic:908ā]
Also, legitimately, Iām surprised no-one changed the name of the Progressive side. I thought for sure someone would have jumped at that.
[/quote]
I KNOW RIGHT!
I think the final Progressive policy should be to change the name of our team to the āWinnersā.
As proof that Iām terrible half-asleep, I already know the answer to the Wonderlander vs PocketyHat debacle, because I did actually read all of that but forgot until after my post.
The remaining parts of the post still stand.
Also, howās the deck right now. What are our percentages?