Pictoshark is One True King-aligned.
3 Likes
Well, thatās an accusation.
Now the question is which one is lying. I mean, I kinda suggested checking the upcoming presidents and pictoshark was opposed, possibly because he didnāt want to get checked. On the other hand, this could also be akafaās plot for us to skip a progressive president. Hmmā¦ hmmmā¦ not sure if worth the risk.
Me and @akafa123 are in conflict. Do not deal into this conflict, do not make your chancellor a member of this conflict, unless you are trying to prove them innocent.
At least one of us is a facist, or @akafa123 is incompetent, or not taking the game seriously. Remember, both of us could be fascist.
By the way, obviously Iām gonna say that Iām progressive aligned.
The bolded part of my post would have been in red, but @Karifean said I couldnāt do that.
Anyway I take it you guys are gonna downvote me, right? Is there any point in putting thought into who I should pick as chancellor?
2 Likes
Since dealing into conflict is probably a bad idea I more than likely will, but that all depends on the votes of others really and what arguments can be made about this conflict to see if we cant find out which is the one who is innocent.
But as it stands, my vote is probably a no due to this conflict, as we do not have the luxury of possibly wasting a progressive policy.
1 Like
Possible values for what is left in the deck are as follows.
Assuming the truth it would be the 2-6.
1 Like
Might just stick to meta. Bleck.
I was pushing for investigating Rabla because I had a hunch that @akafa123 was a King, and I was hoping theyād start a conflict.
ALRIGHT! SPREADSHEET RESULTS! aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand rest beat me to it. : - (
1 Like
Yeah, Iāll probably vote no. Part of me wants to trust you for advising against it yourself, but itās not worth the risk.
I sure hope our next candidates arenāt all OTKs though.
If we donāt elect king this round then all policies stay the same right? When did they actually get shuffled in back?
They get shuffled back when there are not 3 policies in the deck for the next government. We have two more governments to go before the deck is shuffled, providing no auto policies from down voting three governments in a row.
1 Like
That makes sense, thank youo!
Nominate: PocketyHat
Because sticking with meta would pick someone whoās already been pres (as Iād pick Usagi). The downside of picking high numbers, on display for all to see.
1 Like
Voting Phase
@UsagiTenpura @Blackrune @akafa123 @PictoShark @Restkastel @StarTurner @PocketyHat @thesorceress @Wonderlander @Rabla
Since our presidential candidate has chosen a chancellor, itās time for everyone to vote.
President: pictoshark
Chancellor: PocketyHat
Do you trust these two to represent you and the entire village of Hinamizawa and enact a policy on your behalf? You have 24 more hours to get your votes in.
1 Like
inb4 downvote.
Donāt you mean One True King Aligned? Or did you forget the ruuuuules like you forget everything else?
3 Likes
And he is calling me incompetent. What a joke! 
1 Like
For the viewing pleasure of all, we have the third pictoshark meme. This time with a background by @Seraphitic
4 Likes
I am actually inclined to believe @pictoshark here. I mean, why are you all so against him so quickly @Blackrune? @Restkastel?
I sense a OTK conspiracy. I will be voting yes.
I dont like voting into conflict in general. I would be voting against Akafa as well. We know one of them is a OTK, so I would rather just not deal with either of them until further information is obtained. Plus, if there is a OTK policy passed in this government, the results will be rather suspicious and untrustworthy either way with the investigate due to the shadow of doubt over pictoās head. Plus, as I said before, I would rather not take any risk whatsoever with the progressive count in the deck as low as it already is.
Its not that I think for sure hes an OTK, its just that there is a high possibility he is since we know at least one of the two of them is. I would rather skip that government as a result of it.
By not playing into the conflict weāre essentially sacrificing one progressive for one OTK but since we have the number advantage this is ultimately slightly better for us.