shit, by man i mean detective.
Itâs a haunted house. A ghost killed them.
Fight me human side.
There is no magic involved in the outcome of this gameboard.
The detective killed one of the African men. The other African and the Asian later found the corpse by entering the room through a way other than through the door, and because the African is racist, he believed the Asian to be the murderer. He killed the Asian and then committed suicide. The detective was, of course, surprised to see three corpses instead of the one heâd left behind.
Countered by a pre-existing red:
âThe three menâ never harmed each other.
One of the three men was a accomplice to murder, standing by as the killer well, killed them. He had a sudden strike of guilt and couldnât live with his passively and killed himself. The killer shrugged and set up his body along with the others. Everything after that following the Detective was just as it was described.
I was gonna make the Detective a accomplice to murder, but it stopped making sense the more I thought about it.
Well youâve generalised my statement. As long as you donât ask to go into detail with a lime, sure thing.
What was the accompliceâs role in the murder? To put it another way, why did the murderer bother involving him?
The true killer organized a group suicide with the other three. The other three came with the intent to talk him out of it. He then killed them with assorted traps and a chair, in such a way that lines up with the scene.
The other three did not willingly enter the mansion due to reasons given by another person. If they entered the mansion willingly, they did so for a reason that came entirely from themselves or other members of the group of âthe three menâ.
The Accompliceâs role was to convince them to come to the âhaunted houseâ.
Okay then sure, how about [color=blue]one of the three men considered suicide, the other two tried to talk him out of it, and the killer became aware of this and always wanted to perform a triple homicide of foreign people (due to racism).[/color]
Hmm⌠what a interesting question. Well, at least my blue truth wasnât denied right at the beginning.
Itâs possible that the accomplice was brought along to set up the scene as a suicide. After all, two heads are better than one. But while the accomplice was helping the killer set up the scene as was planned, he had a sudden attack of guilt and was overcome by it. He then committed suicide. After that, the killer decided to include his body among those that died.
Going back to before the murder, itâs also possible that the accomplice was there to even the odds. The murder would be more possible to execute if it was 2 vs. 2 instead of 1 vs 3. I donât think our killer is a superhuman. The two men would be more hesitant to defend themselves if it were 2 vs 2 instead of 3 vs 1.
But then wouldnât the accomplice have willingly entered the âhaunted houseâ because the killer told them to?
So what, did the man who wanted to kill himself suceed?
Good question!
Letâs go for [color=blue]no, he didnât want to kill himself by the time he died, so he didnât.[/color]
BUT WHILE WEâRE AT IT
The man couldâve killed himself by electrocution and regretted it as he was shocked.
Two entirely different possibilties. Both seem valid for now, though I might be wrong.
The murderer wanted to murder the other two, and the accomplice was involved because he originally wanted them dead. He was the one who suggested the âhaunted houseâ as the murder scene. He however felt differently afterwards and he felt he could not live with the guilt of two deaths on his hands so he committed suicide.
To counter @Antraâs blues:
From this point forward, I will refer to anyone that murdered any of âthe three menâ as âthe killerâ
The killer is one individual person. That is to say that if multiple of âthe three menâ were murdered then âthe killerâ was the culprit for all of those murders.
The day this board takes place is the first time that the killer has ever committed murder.
The killer has never enlisted any accomplices to help with a murder.
Oooh look, that also sniped Restâs blue of:
NICE!
This is going well!
Now onto @King_Titanite_XVâs bluesâŚ
The first of these is invalid!
You are proposing a theory where someone entered the house wanting to die, and was then murdered.
KuhuhuhuhuâŚ
If multiple of âthe three menâ were murdered then any of those that were murdered did not enter the âhauntedâ house wanting to die, and never wished to die or accepted their death after entering the house.
Next!
Are you saying that your racist killer let one of his targets kill themself?
Why not? Think despair from Danganronpa, this guy is already incredibly racist so heâs fucked in the head. I donât see anything wrong with that
The detective is the culprit, he is free to come and go from the mansion as he pleases and he could have entered after any number of them killed themselves due to the fact that the detective was the first person to enter after the murders began.
The Killer had went through each intended entrance/exit of the room precisely once by the time the gameboardâs narrative ended.
Didnât want to reveal that one this earlyâŚ
[color=blue]Also whoâs to say the man didnât kill himself before the killer revealed himself?[/color]
[color=blue]Perhaps the killer preferred his chances in a 2 v 1?[/color]
[color=blue]Itâs also possible the killer wanted the man to kill himself to see him driven to the edge.[/color]
There are many possibilities as to why the killer preferred the idea of the man commiting suicide.