Yet another little nugget of a mystery [GAME 3] [SOLVED]

ffs previews ree
fixed it now but still

In response to King’s recent blues:

The Killer had went through each intended entrance/exit of the room precisely once by the time the gameboard’s narrative ended.

Then how did the killer leave the room?

The culprit, if he was the detective, still could have entered after two of them killed themselves, knocked out one of them, killed them, and he originally entered through a back door or window instead of the front door.

It possible that he left through a window. Tell me, is there any other means of entrance other than the door?

The killer entered via a point, possibly one only he knew because he was once the landlord of the ‘haunted house’. Then he exited through the front door, probably giving an edgy remark to himself.

OR better, yet, The killer exited the room, maybe via a point only he knew, after the deed was done.

I’m still thinking as to what this ‘door’ may be. **A window is possible, but it could be anything from a door to a back garden that joins up to the room to a secret passage from outside to the room. These ‘doorways’ could be secret, they could be well-known, as long as if they are well known he only walks through them once.**

and

The room single window was not intended to be used as an entrance or an exit by the builders of the room.

The killer has never passed through any unintended entrances or exits of the room.

The room only has one door going into it.

There is an intended entrance to the room besides a door

He didn’t. The killer never left the room. It’s possible that the killer hid inside the room or worse he was discovered still in the room by the Detective. It’s never specified how much time passed in-between the murders and the discovery of the bodies.

This might have been answered already but…

The killer is still in the room. He is either hidden or the detective cannot see them.

Holy shit man that is amazing, I somehow didn’t think of that.
Lemme add to that saying **the detective may be looking at the killer at the end of the narrative. It’s never stated there isn’t a killer in the room. This would certainly explain the detective’s exclamation.**

We are about to have a smack down of red, I can feel it.

it might be lime man you never know

Ah! Didn’t mean to copy you.

There is no such obvious entrance.

When the detective discovered the scene, as depicted at the end of the narrative there are only four people in the room, including the detective and the corpses.

There is a hidden, intended passageway linking the room and the outside of the room

The detective stepped back in shock, leaving the room.

Who said the intended entrance was obvious? As long as when the house was built the builders decided to make it there as an entrance, it is valid. A movable statue or painting isn’t obvious, but is intended. This, or something very similar, is what was used.

Tch, time to go buckwild.

The “haunted” house does not contain any secret rooms.

All of Father’s Knox’s Decalogues that are preceded by an odd prime number are violated by this mystery!

Not a single person in the world knows how to enter any secret passage into or out of this room apart from the first.

The Killer had went through each intended entrance/exit of the room precisely once by the time the gameboard’s narrative ended.

And I can’t remember how this was answered and I could use a recap anyway…

Why are there no signs of a struggle in the room?

Just to clear something up:

A secret room is not a secret passage.

Oshit guise have an idea.

**There was only one door because the doors that were used by the killer to enter were ripped off their hinges, and thrown out of the room. Therefore there was only one door in the room!**

Also **if the killer had time to clear up, he could easily eliminate any signs of a struggle seen by the naked eye.**

There are no signs of a struggle, this includes signs that you need powerful technology to see.

All of the intended entrances to the room are in good condition.